Independent buying guidance · UK editionHow we work

Research that makes a buying decision clearer

Our approach

We explain what published evidence means for a real use case, and keep the limits of that evidence visible.

The question comes before the template

A guide begins with a specific decision: which format fits, what a camera supports, how much storage a recording needs or what must connect to a television. The length and structure follow the information needed to answer it. We do not add unrelated products or paragraphs to reach a word count.

Specifications need an exact identity

A product family can include several generations, capacities and regional bundles. We check the model code and variant before using a claim. A number without its conditions is not a fair comparison; a capacity-specific claim is not automatically true of another size.

Research is not a hands-on test

Our documentary guides use manufacturer information, standards and other relevant primary sources. We do not claim that we bought, used or measured a product unless that work actually occurred and can be documented. Editorial conclusions explain who a specification or format may suit; they are not invented laboratory results.

Editorial responsibility

Gearjury editorial team is the organisation responsible for the guides in this pilot. We do not invent individual authors, professional credentials or personal product ownership. Human review is a separate responsibility from drafting assistance, and publication approval must be recorded before a draft becomes a live article.

Sources and corrections

Source links sit with each developed guide so readers can inspect the basis of technical claims. Where information changes or a comparison is found to use the wrong variant, the affected claim needs correction rather than a new date added to an unchanged page. A correction should record what changed and why in the internal editorial register.

For this private preview, feedback is collected through the project review with Adrián. The preview does not pretend to operate a public contact service that has not been established.

Images should answer to the content

Editorial photography illustrates the relevant use and occupies a defined responsive frame. An editorial scene does not prove a named product was tested. A named product’s photograph must match its model and variant and have an approved source. A generic drawing or an invented branded image is not a substitute.

Commercial links do not establish a verdict

A retailer link provides a purchase route. It is not evidence of product performance or proof that the option is suitable for everyone. We keep the editorial reasoning separate from the retailer and avoid prices or availability that cannot be kept accurate.

Read how recommendations and links work, or explore the buying guides.